An interesting shortage of commitments in the context of an epistolary novel refers to a situation where there are fewer commitments or obligations among the characters than one might expect, and this scarcity of commitments can create intrigue, suspense, or complexity in the story. Here are a couple of examples to illustrate this concept:
Unfulfilled Promises
In an epistolary novel, two characters may exchange letters where they make significant promises or commitments to each other. For example, Character A promises to help Character B achieve a lifelong dream. However, as the story unfolds, Character A’s circumstances change, making it impossible to fulfill that promise. This creates an interesting shortage of commitment because the story’s tension arises from the unfulfilled promise, and readers are left wondering how this unresolved commitment will affect the characters and the plot.
Hidden Agendas
Characters in an epistolary novel may have hidden agendas or commitments that are undisclosed to other characters. For instance, Character X is secretly committed to sabotaging Character Y’s plans. This hidden agenda can create an intriguing shortage of commitments because, on the surface, the characters may appear to have fewer commitments than they actually do. As the plot unfolds, readers may become aware of these hidden commitments, adding depth and suspense to the story.
Mystery and Intrigue
Sometimes, an epistolary novel can present a situation where characters have limited knowledge of each other’s commitments or obligations. This can result in a shortage of commitment in the sense that characters are not entirely aware of the promises or responsibilities held by others. As the story progresses, revelations about these commitments can become central to the plot, generating intrigue and suspense.
Contradictory Commitments
Characters may find themselves torn between conflicting commitments or obligations. For example, Character M may have a commitment to their family that contradicts a commitment to their work or a personal relationship. Further, this can create an interesting shortage of commitment in the sense that characters are grappling with multiple obligations, and readers are engaged in the tension and choices that result from these conflicts.
In each of these examples, the shortage of commitment isn’t about a lack of plot elements. But rather about the complexity and tension arising from the commitments made by characters and how those commitments intersect, conflict, or remain unfulfilled. This complexity can make an epistolary novel more engaging and thought-provoking for readers.
